I switched on Radio 6 this morning, and the track they were playing had a drum sound which caught my ear. It reminded me of a rototom - a tuned drum which was quite popular in the 80s. I had a set of three in my drum kit. I doubt many listeners would have made that connection. I suspect many listeners would not even have particularly distinguished that drum sound. I think many people just hear songs in a much less differentiated way, unless they make a real effort. I, like most musicians, tend to hear the guitar, the drums, the bass, the keyboard and the vocals separately. In other words, I am extracting more information from the audio than some might. It would be tempting to imagine, therefore, that I would learn better through hearing than through other senses. But that is nonsense. Imagine trying to learn about the physical geography of a country through hearing about it without a map! But this is exactly the argument made by people who insist they are "visual learn
Hello. This is pretty cool, how would someone like me go about doing that? SJ
ReplyDeleteLatex and funky.... in the same post?! ;-)
ReplyDeleteHmm... it does rather stretch the meaning of "funky" doesn't it?
ReplyDeleteThe plugin is here:
http://www.anlak.com/?page_id=66
To make it work I had to comment out the require Snoopy line in the plugin script.
Hi Jonesieboy. Looks great but is snoopy not a black and white dog (Translated: you lost me when you started talking about snoopy lines in plugin scripts). We need to have a serious chat at some point so you can bring me up to speed.
ReplyDeleteCheers dude
I like the sound of latex!
Hi Craig. I'm talking to David Gilmour about setting this up for exc-el blogs. Getting it working for comments may be a bit trickier. Meanwhile, you'll be wanting to mug up on LaTEX markup - here's a good place to start:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.forkosh.com/mimetextutorial.html
Unfortunately it doesn't work in comment - hey I just fixed it so it does! Man, being a geek is so useful!
[tex]e^x=\sum_{n=0}^\infty\frac{x^n}{n!}[/tex]
Thanks for the link Robert. Very Useful. I'm just getting into my laTEX and it's time for bed unfortunately. See you tomorrow.
ReplyDelete[...] http://www.jonesieboy.co.uk/blog/2006/11/21/maths-formula-test/#comments [...]
ReplyDeleteAccording to the typographical pedants who wrote the specification, it should be typed as [tex]\LaTeX [/tex] or LaTeX in ordinary text. Nice though
ReplyDeletePhew - I've finally found out why plus signs were getting chomped - it was to do with the fancy comment posting done by this theme - 3K2. Once I disabled it, everything worked fine. As a final test:
ReplyDelete[tex]\frac{5x^2+3x+2}{7x^3+4}[/tex]