TIMSS 2007

The TIMSS (Trends in Mathematics and Science Study) 2007 report is out.  The headline news is that England has jumped up the ranking for performance in science and maths at P2 and S2, whilst Scotland has remained pretty much where it was back in 2003.

This is clearly not good news for any politician, but I was rather alarmed to hear Fiona Hyslop's knee-jerk reaction that these figures called for urgent action.

Don't we have a clear agenda in Scotland for progress in education, called A Curriculum for Excellence?  Doesn't it say that we seek to develop 4 capacities in our young people?  Is it not inevitable that our attempt to develop these 4 capacities might result in our youngsters doing slightly less well in dry measurments of subject-based competencies?  Is aCfE not doomed if we launch into defensive action the first time a study suggests that this might be happening?

I am certain that the Latin skills of the average 16 year old in Scotland have declined dramatically since 1950.  I am equally certain that this is not a cause for concern.  Is anyone in power going to be brave enough to stand up and say that the same might be true of the TIMSS results?  If not, then their support for A Curriculum For Excellence is just so much hot air.

No teacher in Scotland should be complacent about the numeracy and science skills of our young people.  They matter a great deal.  But we should pause to reflect before acting.

Comments

  1. Yes, I though this would cause some problem for you folks when I saw the scores. Good luck.

    Also, tell your traffic feed that I do NOT live in Cranston!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Also the comparision was between our own national measuements of these comparitive levels. If we say we are good (not very likely in Scotland) then we would go up. If we underplay our own scores then we slip down these scores.
    So these 'values' seem to be neither based on numeracy or scientific practice

    ReplyDelete
  3. Not sure that I follow you Ian. Some of the stuff is based on questionnaires about attitudes, but mostly it's based on quantitative performances in tests.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks.

    Traffic feed is not very clever. Thinks I'm in Airdrie.

    ReplyDelete
  5. this is an awsome blog

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Learning styles are a myth and I am not an auditory learner

Some Thoughts about Skills-Based Curricula

Knowing and Understanding in Mathematics