Maths Formula Test

[tex]\Large f(x)=\int_{-\infty}^x e^{-t^2}dt[/tex]

Just testing that a funky new plugin to render maths formulae is working :)

Couldn't resist squeezing in another example:

[tex]\sum_{r=1}^{n}r=\frac12 n(n+1)[/tex]

Comments

  1. Steve-O21 November 2006 at 14:39

    Hello. This is pretty cool, how would someone like me go about doing that? SJ

    ReplyDelete
  2. Kate Farrell21 November 2006 at 16:50

    Latex and funky.... in the same post?! ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  3. jonesieboy21 November 2006 at 18:12

    Hmm... it does rather stretch the meaning of "funky" doesn't it?

    The plugin is here:

    http://www.anlak.com/?page_id=66

    To make it work I had to comment out the require Snoopy line in the plugin script.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Craig21 November 2006 at 19:46

    Hi Jonesieboy. Looks great but is snoopy not a black and white dog (Translated: you lost me when you started talking about snoopy lines in plugin scripts). We need to have a serious chat at some point so you can bring me up to speed.

    Cheers dude

    I like the sound of latex!

    ReplyDelete
  5. jonesieboy21 November 2006 at 20:30

    Hi Craig. I'm talking to David Gilmour about setting this up for exc-el blogs. Getting it working for comments may be a bit trickier. Meanwhile, you'll be wanting to mug up on LaTEX markup - here's a good place to start:

    http://www.forkosh.com/mimetextutorial.html

    Unfortunately it doesn't work in comment - hey I just fixed it so it does!  Man, being a geek is so useful!
    [tex]e^x=\sum_{n=0}^\infty\frac{x^n}{n!}[/tex]

    ReplyDelete
  6. Craig21 November 2006 at 22:03

    Thanks for the link Robert. Very Useful. I'm just getting into my laTEX and it's time for bed unfortunately. See you tomorrow.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Funky Maths Formulae at Stebblog21 November 2006 at 22:46

    [...] http://www.jonesieboy.co.uk/blog/2006/11/21/maths-formula-test/#comments [...]

    ReplyDelete
  8. digitalsean22 November 2006 at 15:45

    According to the typographical pedants who wrote the specification, it should be typed as [tex]\LaTeX [/tex] or LaTeX in ordinary text. Nice though

    ReplyDelete
  9. jonesieboy22 November 2006 at 19:35

    Phew - I've finally found out why plus signs were getting chomped - it was to do with the fancy comment posting done by this theme - 3K2. Once I disabled it, everything worked fine. As a final test:

    [tex]\frac{5x^2+3x+2}{7x^3+4}[/tex]

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

ActiVote Walkthrough Part 1

Image
At my visit to Musselburgh Grammar this morning, I spoke to some of the maths department about using Activote. They were enthusiastic about the potential of the technology, but said something like "it looks easy as you stand there and explain it, but we'll forget everything you've said by the time we next come to use it". So.... to provide a bit of backup, here's a step by step guide to using Activote with your class. The following assumes that the voting pads have been registered with your PC. If not, chase up IT! Setting up the User Database You'll want your pupil names to be stored in the system, so that their names appear at the top of the screen when you run a vote. Here's how.... In East Lothian, we have a problem - we don't have write-access to the place on the C drive where the user database is stored! To get around this, we need to copy the default user database to somewhere that is writeable, then tell ACTIVStudio that we've done so: I
Read more

Someone is looking for the Catburgers!

I was most surprised today to discover that the top search phrase leading people to this blog over the last few weeks has been "the catburgers." This is the name of the indie band I was in back in the late '80s (I sang and played guitar). I can't imagine who might be looking for my old band, unless it is some kids in North Berwick who heard about the band through my son. Whoever it might be, I'll take advantage of this opportunity to post up some mp3s from the good old days, both recorded in 1987.  I just realised that's 20 years ago!  Time for a reunion tour of the states... anyway here are "Children's TV" and "First Day of Spring" for your entertainment: [audio:childrens-tv.mp3] [audio:first-day-of-spring.mp3] After all, you have to keep your visitors happy don't you?
Read more

What the DFES report on interactive whiteboards really says

There have been several headlines over the last few days along the lines of "£50 million wasted on iwbs", based on this study from the DFES. So what does it really say? Unsurprisingly, it does not say that iwbs are a waste of money: Overall, the statistical analysis failed to find evidence of any impact of the increase in IWB acquisition in London schools on attainment in the three core subjects in the academic year 2004/5. However, given the variation in use documented in the case studies, this is in line with what we would predict at this stage in the policy cycle. The study is worth reading in its entirety, but if you want my spin on it, I picked up on a couple of key points: A theme running through the report is that this technology itself will not change what happens in classrooms. ....the introduction of an IWB does not in and of itself transform existing pedagogies. The capacity of IWBs to support, extend or transform existing pedagogies depends upon the teacher's
Read more